tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post1980882669427656764..comments2024-03-03T04:40:39.492-05:00Comments on Fire Megan McArdle: It's called the primary process, Meganbradhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06907349163323395529noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-15476916809206040142007-10-12T23:32:00.000-04:002007-10-12T23:32:00.000-04:00You have an hysterical rebuttal to every post she ...<I>You have an hysterical rebuttal to <B>every post she makes</B> within an hour or two.</I> <BR/><BR/>Megan somehow manages to be a prolific poster despite being pathologically lazy. We, on the other hand, are just pathologically lazy.<BR/><BR/>Go count her posts and then count ours. I suspect you'll find less than a one-to-one match.Fishbone McGoniglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10296472885854104262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-71799651063812349812007-10-12T17:34:00.000-04:002007-10-12T17:34:00.000-04:00Hmm, you might want to check the timestamps more c...Hmm, you might want to check the timestamps more closely, anon. Megan does most of her work in the morning, I get around to laughing at her around 2 or 3. N I'd say we don't respond to more of her posts than we mock. But hey, thanks for reading.bradhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06907349163323395529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-38830675555316262222007-10-12T17:28:00.000-04:002007-10-12T17:28:00.000-04:00You have an hysterical rebuttal to every post she ...You have an hysterical rebuttal to every post she makes within an hour or two. Within the constraints of constantly monitoring someone over the Internet, that's stalking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-81060412382335063542007-10-12T17:21:00.000-04:002007-10-12T17:21:00.000-04:00Well, then you have a very odd definition of stalk...Well, then you have a very odd definition of stalking. Usually, it involves following someone around.bradhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06907349163323395529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-25063569257350913212007-10-12T17:04:00.000-04:002007-10-12T17:04:00.000-04:00You're not contributing usefully to the public deb...You're not contributing usefully to the public debate, you're not constructively criticizing a very mildly significant blogger, you're not aiming for anything useful... you're just obsessively nitpicking a B lister. I'd call that stalking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-10006996806276190422007-10-12T15:38:00.000-04:002007-10-12T15:38:00.000-04:00Yeah, sure, that's what we are. Stalkers.[rollseye...Yeah, sure, that's what we are. Stalkers.<BR/><BR/>[rollseyes]Fishbone McGoniglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10296472885854104262noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-40773767477851956732007-10-12T15:04:00.000-04:002007-10-12T15:04:00.000-04:00Good lord, is this sad affair still going on? If ...Good lord, is this sad affair still going on? If the measure of a stalker is the stature of his obsession, you've ranked yourself pretty low.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-90845591307347915782007-10-12T13:49:00.000-04:002007-10-12T13:49:00.000-04:00Well, to my mind the objection to dynasties is suf...Well, to my mind the objection to dynasties is sufficient reason to loathe a Clinton ticket, so little Megan's got a point there. Of course, it's a point that's been obvious, and discussed, for about the last five fucking years, so I guess they didn't hire the flake for her special insight.<BR/><BR/>Could it be that they took her on to deflect attention from the embarrassment of hiring that narcissistic ignoramus Sullivan?<BR/>-- sgloverAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2048715035467766557.post-63029126189300840442007-10-11T17:07:00.000-04:002007-10-11T17:07:00.000-04:00The only reason it hasn't already (or so I mote) i...<I>The only reason it hasn't already (or so I mote) is that the other Democratic candidates are trying to avoid doing anything to tarnish the nostalgic glow that currently surrounds the last Democratic presidency.</I><BR/><BR/>This is probably the dumbest goddamn sentence contained on the Internet, and not because of the hyperpretentious use of the word "mote" (though that doesn't help).<BR/><BR/>Does she understand how politics works? Like, at all?<BR/><BR/>Wait, don't answer that.Fishbone McGoniglehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10296472885854104262noreply@blogger.com